Comparison worksheet
Marketing Agency Evaluation Scorecard
Which agency model best fits the firm's strategy, intake, reporting, ethics, staffing, and first-90-day needs?
Use this worksheet to compare agencies by decision quality and operating fit, not by generic activity promises.
Agency Selection
Marketing Agency Evaluation Scorecard
- Strategy01
- Market fluency02
- Intake03
- Reporting04
- Data ownership05
- Ethics06
- Staffing07
- First 90 days08
Version 1.0 · Reviewed July 30, 2026
Direct Answer
Use this worksheet to compare agencies by decision quality and operating fit, not by generic activity promises.
What You Get
- Transparent local scoring.
- Dimension-level missed controls.
- Prioritized next actions.
- Print-ready output.
How This Works
Transparent methodology and limitations
Agency Selection
Marketing Agency Evaluation Scorecard
- Strategy01
- Market fluency02
- Intake03
- Reporting04
- Data ownership05
- Ethics06
- Staffing07
- First 90 days08
Version 1.0 · Reviewed July 30, 2026
Agency Selection control map
A marketing agency evaluation scorecard for comparing strategic judgment, market fluency, intake awareness, reporting, data ownership, ethics, staffing, and the first 90 days.
The scorecard does not select a vendor automatically and does not validate any agency's claims. It structures a better comparison conversation.
Interactive Assessment
Complete the visible controls.
Choose the option that best matches observable evidence. The result stays in this browser and is not submitted.
Result Summary
Complete the assessment to see your result.
0 of 8 controls answered.
Nothing is saved until you choose to save this result.
Sources and Editorial Basis
Reference basis includes Google Search Central SEO Starter Guide, Google Ads web conversion setup guidance, Google Analytics campaign URL guidance, FTC guidance on reviews and endorsements, ABA Model Rule 7.1 communications concerning lawyer services. Platform documentation and regulatory references are distinguished from CliqSpark practitioner interpretation.
Related Guides
PI Agency Evaluation Scorecard
| Criterion | Importance | Question | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| PI market fluency | High | How do you define a qualified PI opportunity? | Generic legal examples |
| Intake awareness | High | Where does intake data enter the plan? | No call outcome review |
| Attribution quality | High | What data belongs to the firm? | Opaque reporting |
| Ethical discipline | High | How are claims and reviews governed? | Guaranteed results |
Agency Selection
How PI Firms Should Choose a Marketing Agency
A scorecard for evaluating agency fit, legal marketing judgment, reporting discipline, and first-90-day expectations.
Balanced Operating-Model Comparison
CliqSpark model
- Senior-led
- Specialized
- Integrated
- Customized
- Selective scale
Best fit: senior strategy and integrated prioritization.
Tradeoff: selective scale.
Traditional larger-agency model
- Broader staffing
- Departmental specialization
- Larger production capacity
- Standardized systems
- Enterprise scale
Best fit: broad production capacity.
Tradeoff: more standardization.
CliqSpark Model
CliqSpark vs. Traditional Legal Marketing Agencies
A fair comparison of boutique, senior-led strategy and traditional agency operating models.
- Executive
- Channel
- Intake
PI Conversion & Intake
What PI Firms Should Track in a Marketing Dashboard
A dashboard guide for PI firms defining executive, channel, intake, quality, and retained-case metrics while separating leading and lagging indicators.
Next Step
Want a second set of eyes on the result?
Use the resource first, then bring the gaps into a focused strategy conversation.